AEG AB61C2DB Clean 6000

Price in EUR including VAT, free shipping
Delivered between 15/1/2025 and 23/1/2025
More than 10 items in stock at supplier

Product details

Key specifications

Vacuum cleaner type
Vacuum cleaner with bag
Power consumption
850 W
Item number
39605814

General information

Manufacturer
Category
Release date
29.10.2023

Vacuum cleaner properties

Vacuum cleaner type
Vacuum cleaner with bag

Power supply

Power consumption
850 W

Scope of delivery

Scope of delivery
1 piece

Package dimensions

Length
65 cm
Width
40 cm
Height
30 cm
Weight
9 kg

14-day cancellation right
30-day right of return
Return policy
24 Months Statutory warrantyGuarantee provisions

Reviews & Ratings

Statutory warranty score

How often does a product of this brand in the «Vacuum cleaners» category have a defect within the first 24 months?

Source: Galaxus
  • 35.Domo
  • 36.Profi-Care
  • 37.AEG
  • 38.Genius
  • 39.Tineco

Statutory warranty case duration

How many working days on average does it take to process a warranty claim from when it arrives at the service centre until it’s back with the customer?

Source: Galaxus
  • 16.Profi-Care
  • 16.Thomas
  • 21.AEG
  • 21.Hoover
  • 21.Numatic

Return rate

How often is a product of this brand in the «Vacuum cleaners» category returned?

Source: Galaxus
  • 10.Dreame
  • 10.Electrolux
  • 14.AEG
  • 14.Black & Decker
  • 14.Domo
Source: Galaxus

Translation: machine translated
Very good89/100Rank 5 out of 6
Testmagazin Logo
Testmagazin14 Kabelstaubsauger im TestReleaseApril 2024
  • Positiveenormous radius of action (scil. ~ 12.4 m)
  • PositiveConstant suction power
  • PositiveStrong cleaning results on hard floors
  • NegativeFloor nozzle difficult to push in parts
  • NegativePoor cleaning performance over carpets

The enormous operating radius of = 12.4 m is just one of the features that make this model stand out. It also shines with its almost constant suction power and, above all, its excellent cleaning results on hard floors. However, when it comes to carpets, the results are significantly weaker...