Gira Basic Q
- free shipping
- Free returns within 30 days
- Paypal, Klarna and Credit Card
- 4.3 for Galaxus on Trustpilot
More than 10 items in stock at supplier
Product details
Increased quality criteria and technical developments in smoke alarms are signalled on the market with the new Q test mark. The new Q label is an independent, manufacturer-independent quality mark for high-quality smoke alarm devices that are subjected to special tests for continuous use. The latest generation of Gira smoke alarm devices fulfils the criteria of the new Q label. The smoke alarm devices work according to the photoelectric scattered light principle without radioactive particles. The smoke alarm devices detect smoke accumulations at an early stage and emit a warning signal before the smoke concentration can become dangerous for people. The alarm is signalled by a loud pulsating alarm tone and a flashing LED.
Hazard detector type | Smoke detectors |
Alarm signal | Optical warning signal |
Sound power level | 80 dB |
Transmission type | Wireless |
Power supply | Battery operated, Rechargeable battery operated |
mounting style | Finery |
Items per sales unit | 1 x |
Item number | 15656356 |
30-day right of returnReturn policy
Reviews & Ratings
Statutory warranty score
How often does a product of this brand in the «Hazard detectors» category have a defect within the first 24 months?
Source: Galaxus- 23.EQ-31 %
- 23.Netatmo1 %
- 25.Hombli1.2 %
- 26.Gira1.6 %
- 27.Fibaro1.8 %
Statutory warranty case duration
How many working days on average does it take to process a warranty claim from when it arrives at the service centre until it’s back with the customer?
Source: Galaxus- 1.Brennenstuhl0 days
- 1.Fibaro0 days
- 1.Gira0 days
- 1.Shelly0 days
- 7.Hombli1 day
Return rate
How often is a product of this brand in the «Hazard detectors» category returned?
Source: Galaxus- 24.Aqara4.1 %
- 25.Alecto4.2 %
- 26.Gira4.4 %
- 27.X-Sense4.8 %
- 28.Busch-Jaeger5.2 %
Basically, the Gira 114502 Basic Q is a very average smoke detector with a big catch: unfortunately, it failed the robustness evaluation point in the test and was punished for this with a merely adequate final score. Even so, the device would not have been a real highlight, even if at least the reliability was quite positive.